Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nuir.lib.nu.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2552
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorTHAKSIYA THAKSINen
dc.contributorทักษิญา ทักษิญth
dc.contributor.advisorTanapon Sornsuwanen
dc.contributor.advisorธนพล ศรสุวรรณth
dc.contributor.otherNaresuan University. Faculty of Dentistryen
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T04:35:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-01T04:35:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nuir.lib.nu.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2552-
dc.descriptionMaster of Science (M.S.)en
dc.descriptionวิทยาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต (วท.ม.)th
dc.description.abstractPoly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) is an acrylic resin widely used as a denture base material for the Thai elderly for a long time. However, there are still some structural limitations that promote microbial adhesion. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were recently introduced as a surface coating because of their antimicrobial effect. Development of the surface coating with the AgNPs is an attractive strategy to improve the denture's hygiene. This study aims to compare the effects of PMMA surface coating methods with the AgNPs on PMMA’s surface roughness, characteristics of AgNPs, and bacterial adhesion. Materials and methods: Three different AgNP coating methods (simple immersion, ultrasound irradiation, and microwave irradiation) were used. Six PMMA discs of each method were prepared and compared surface roughness values (Ra) between pre and post-coating and three methods (n=6). The characteristics of AgNPs were also evaluated by using FE-SEM. Fifty PMMA discs were divided into five groups (Negative control, Positive control, Simple immersion, Ultrasound irradiation, and Microwave irradiation) (n=10). The specimens were incubated in S. aureus suspension and incubated at 37 ºc for 3 hours. Then bacterial adhesion analysis was evaluated by the spread plate method. Results: There were differences in the surface roughness between pre and post-coating and among the three methods. The simple immersion method provided AgNPs with small size and regularly distributed nanospheres. In comparison, the AgNPs from ultrasound and microwave methods were varying size nanospheres and agglomerations. There were differences in the bacterial adhesion between the selected AgNPs coating methods compared to the control. The simple immersion method allowed a better reduction of bacterial adhesion than other methods. Nevertheless, there were no differences in the bacterial adhesion between ultrasound and microwave methods. Conclusion: Different AgNP coating methods affect different surface roughness of PMMA and the shape, size, and distribution patterns of the AgNPs. Interestingly, the simple immersion method provided the most significant bacterial reduction.en
dc.description.abstract-th
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNaresuan Universityen_US
dc.rightsNaresuan Universityen_US
dc.subjectDenture baseen
dc.subjectPolymethylmethacrylateen
dc.subjectPMMAen
dc.subjectAcrylic resinen
dc.subjectSilver nanoparticleen
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen
dc.subjectBacterial adhesionen
dc.subject.classificationDentistryen
dc.titleผลของการเคลือบผิวโพลี(เมทิลเมทาคริเลต)ด้วยอนุภาคนาโนเงินด้วยวิธีที่ต่างกันต่อลักษณะพื้นผิวและการเกาะติดของแบคทีเรียth
dc.titleEffect of Different Silver Nanoparticle Coating Methods of Poly(methyl methacrylate) on the Surface Characterization and Bacterial Adhesionen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.typeวิทยานิพนธ์th
Appears in Collections:คณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
61061055.pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NU Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.