An Analysis of the Metadiscourse Markers in English Research Articles Published in Naresuan University Journals

Abstract

The purposes of this study were 1) to investigate the Metadiscourse Markers used in Humanities and Social Sciences English research articles published in Naresuan University (NU) Journals, 2) to investigate the Metadiscourse Markers used in Science and Technology English research articles published in NU Journals, and 3) to compare the Metadiscourse Markers used in English research articles between these two disciplines. Hyland’s (2005) Metadiscourse Markers (MDMs) model was the main framework employed in this study, consisting of two major categories of MDMs, namely Interactive and Interactional categories. The Interactive category includes Transitions (TR), Frame Markers (FM), Endophoric Markers (ED), Evidential Markers (EV), and Code glosses (CD). The Interactional category includes Hedges (HE), Boosters (BO), Attitude Markers (AM), Engagement Markers (EM), and self-mentions (SM). The data were a total of 40 datasets of written texts in the introduction and literature review sections published in NU Journals. 20 datasets were from Humanities and Social Sciences English research articles, and the other 20 datasets were from Science and Technology English research articles. They both were purposively selected from NU Journals between 2019 and 2022. The MDMs were collected and analyzed based on Hyland’s (2005) taxonomy of MDMs. The findings revealed that both disciplinary authors tended to employ MDMs almost equally in research articles. Also, they both employed Interactive MDMs more frequently. These findings are relevant for the teaching of research writing, highlighting that academic author should pay attention to the conventions of MDM usage in different disciplines.

-